Procedure

Annual Reward Procedure for Grade 10 Staff

Updated on 5 September 2023

How the Reward Policy for grade 10 staff is implemented and form for applications/nominations.

On this page

Contents

  1. Introduction
  2. Objectives, Achievements and Markers of Esteem
  3. Purpose of the Procedure
  4. Eligibility
  5. Procedure

1. Introduction

The Annual Reward Procedure for grade 10 staff explains the way in which the Reward Policy for grade 10 staff is implemented for considering possible increases to base salary and related decisions.

At the core of the process is the requirement for Deans and the University Secretary to ensure that their grade 10 staff are provided with clear SMART objectives, as part of their Objective-setting & Review (OSaR) meetings, that these are discussed and reviewed regularly throughout the year so that both the individual and the Dean or the University Secretary fully understands the progress being made.  Where the volume of grade 10 staff in a particular School or a Directorate means that the Dean or University Secretary cannot undertake OSaR meetings for all of their grade 10 staff, they should nominate a Reviewer and they must ensure that the Reviewer keeps them apprised of individuals’ performance at regular intervals.  Where considered necessary or appropriate the Dean or University Secretary should meet with the individual.

Applications and nominations for base salary increases are welcomed equally.  Whilst applications are encouraged from staff who feel their performance merits a salary increase, the University does not wish to overlook meritorious performance because the member of staff has not made an application.  For this reason there is the option for a member of Grade 10 staff to be nominated by their Dean or Director.

2. Objectives, achievements and markers of esteem

It is appreciated that, on occasion, an opportunity may arise which is agreed takes priority over the previously set objectives or a marker of esteem is awarded (e.g. FRS, recognition in the Honours list) and the process allows for these aspects to be taken into account in the performance and reward decisions.

3. Purpose of the procedure

The procedure will:

  • encourage discussion about performance at Academic Appraisal or OSaR meetings and update meetings
  • relate the performance to a performance rating (see Reward Policy for Grade 10 Staff)
  • allow the individual to choose whether or not they wish to apply for a salary increase
  • allow a Dean or Director to nominate a member of staff for a salary increase
  • use a consistent approach to ensure fairness and transparency in the process
  • be subject to a process of checks and balances
  • provide feedback to individuals.

4. Eligibility

No member of grade 10 staff will be considered for a salary increase if they have not engaged fully in the Academic Appraisal or OSaR process, be it personally, conducting Academic Appraisal or OSaR meetings for their direct reports and, where necessary, nominating Reviewers.  Deans, the University Secretary and Directors also must have a full understanding of the contributions their grade 10 staff are making in order that they may recognise achievements or intervene where there are performance difficulties.

5. Procedure

Step Timescale Action
     1 Prior 1 October
  • Objectives set for the coming year, for all grade 10 staff, linked to the University/School/Directorate strategy.
  • Where the Dean or University Secretary is unable to undertake all their grade 10 OSaR meetings a Reviewer should be appointed by them.
     2 1 October – 31 July
  • Regular discussions about progress of objectives and other achievements:
    • Chair of Court with the Principal
    • Principal with Deputy Vice-Chancellor & Provost, VPs and University Secretary
    • Deputy Vice-Chancellor & Provost with Deans
    • Deans with professorial staff
    • University Secretary with Directors
    • Directors with their grade 10 staff
  • Where appointed, the Reviewer must keep the Dean/University Secretary apprised of individuals’ progress against their objectives/achievements.
  • Where necessary or appropriate the Dean or the University Secretary will meet with an individual to discuss or guide performance.
     3 1 – 31 August
  • Final review of objectives/achievements. 
  • This will involve the:
    • Chair of Court with the Principal
    • Principal with the Deputy Vice-Chancellor & Provost/VPs/University Secretary
    • Deputy Vice-Chancellor & Provost with individual Deans
    • Deans or Reviewer with individual professorial staff
    • University Secretary with individual Directors
    • Directors with their grade 10 staff
  • Discussion, feedback and performance rating notified to the individual.
     4 October
  • Individuals may apply for a base salary increase or a Dean or Director may nominate a member of staff. The case should include objectives set for the previous period, details of whether the objectives have been completed or completed to the stage stated on the Academic Appraisal* or OSaR documentation; where the individual has added value, taken advantage of an opportunity, exceeded expectations or received a marker of esteem and the performance rating (see Appendix 1 and section 7 of Reward Policy for Grade 10 staff).
  • Applications and Nominations should be gathered by the Dean or University Secretary.
      5 October
  • Deans’ and University Secretary’s appraisal of the merit of the applications/nominations for their School/Directorates.
      6 November
  • Deans meet as a group to propose, discuss and challenge the meritorious cases to peers and reasons for not proposing other applications received.  All academic applications and nominations must be seen and considered by this group.   Meeting chaired by SVP.  Director of People (or their Deputy) in attendance to advise on salary benchmarking data.
  • Professional Services members of UEG plus a representative from the Deans group will meet to propose, discuss and challenge the meritorious cases and reasons for not proposing other applications received. All Professional Services applications must be seen and considered by this group.  Meeting chaired by University Secretary.  Director of People (or their Deputy) to advise on salary benchmarking data.
  • Proposals agreed.
      7 November
  • Proposals taken to UEG by  Deputy Vice-Chancellor & Provost/ and University Secretary for discussion, challenge and final approval.
  • UEG to consider and approve any salary increases for Deans
      8 Remuneration Committee - December/January
  • Remuneration Committee reviews the application of the process.
  • Remuneration Committee decides any base salary increases for the Principal and members of UEG based on the same mechanism as used for other grade 10 staff.
  • Remuneration Committee advised of UEG’s decision on other grade 10 staff.

Transitional arrangements are in place for Academic Appraisal. Appraisals to be completed by 31 July and objectives agreed in advance of the new academic year commencing.