Introduction

Dundee Ocean and Lake Frontiers Institute and Neutrals (DOLFIN)

DOLFIN is a research and know-how platform designed to support and strengthen the activities of the two existing natural resources centres (CEPMLP and Centre for Water Law, Policy and Science) and other departments of the University of Dundee, and to draw upon their expertise as well as external sources in a multi-disciplinary fashion by focusing on a field of study lying at the intersection of geoscience, international law and international relations, namely, the Law of the Sea, especially maritime boundary delimitation.

Background‌

Fewer than half of the 640 or so potential maritime boundaries in the world have been agreed. The complex process of agreeing and fixing boundaries or making provisional arrangements can be time-consuming and expensive but once agreed can significantly contribute to the economic wealth of the affected countries. Disputes over maritime boundaries, some involving lakes as opposed to seas, regularly flare up around the world and sometimes result in armed skirmishes. Lake Countries (at present nine major lakes in Africa have oil and gas blocks issued and/or being issued) and Coastal States with competing claims to maritime areas routinely grant oil and gas concessions in disputed waters without the investors being fully aware of the underlying inter-State dispute. Indeed, maritime boundary disputes form a misunderstood and frequently overlooked area of investment risk management in the energy sector.

The creation of maritime boundaries involves the use of geology, oceanography, technology, money, law, history, politics and diplomacy. The modern Law of the Sea (LOS), as codified in the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), and the determination of maritime boundaries and related matters of interest to more than 160 Coastal States and the energy, mining, fishing and telecommunications industries involve a mixture of law, science and diplomacy. This calls for a multi-disciplinary approach.

UNCLOS, which has been ratified by 166 States and the European Union, is not just a set of principles but establishes legally binding obligations for each Party. States that have ratified UNCLOS are entitled to claim all natural resource rights to the water and ocean floor up to 200 nautical miles from their coastline and in exceptional cases even beyond that distance. Technological advances in deepwater drilling and melting ice caps are associated with claims for an extended continental shelf (ECS) by the Coastal States involved. As of June 2015, 100 individual ECS claims had been formally deposited under UNCLOS by 81 countries worldwide (74 Full Submissions and 26 Preliminary Submissions), with submissions by additional countries possibly still to come. The present ECS maritime space, i.e., 200 nautical miles to “computed” geological ECS as claimed in these 100 submissions, covers approximately 34.6 million square kilometres globally.

In certain geographical settings, the rights set forth in UNCLOS can result in overlapping claims and boundary disputes which the disputing States are under a Pieter Bekker legal obligation to resolve in accordance with international law. Approximately four-fifths of the world’s known oil and gas reserves lies in contested regions. Of the 640 or so potential maritime boundaries in the world, only some 275 are signed or in force — with 362 classified as “un-resolved and/or in-dispute,” meaning nearly 57 percent of all maritime boundaries remain “un-resolved.” The percentage of unresolved maritime boundaries is particularly high in Africa and Asia. In Africa alone, seven land-locked countries (Burundi, Ethiopia, Malawi, Rwanda, Uganda, Zambia, Zimbabwe) face un-delimited lake boundaries.

Lake Countries and Coastal States are increasingly turning to international courts and tribunals, both standing bodies and ad hoc tribunals, for resolving their maritime boundary disputes. Since the late 1960s, more than 20 rulings by different tribunals have shaped the maritime boundary “jurisprudence.” Provisional arrangements in the form of joint development of disputed zones are also on the rise. Such disputes and arrangements call for the application of legal and technological know-how and expertise which is often lacking within the countries and industries involved. Thus, know-how concerning international maritime boundaries, particularly the technical geo-scientific aspects and the principles emerging from the evolving jurisprudence, has never been more relevant than it is today, where the stakes for Lake Countries and Coastal States, especially developing countries, and their concessionaires are so high, with the outcome affecting a country’s prospects for economic development as well as multi-billion dollar investments by the energy industry.

 

DolphinMission Statement

  • Through research, teaching, training and consultancy, DOLFIN promotes understanding of the legal and techno-scientific aspects of international maritime boundary determination, fosters the peaceful resolution of lake and ocean boundary disputes and addresses broader legal and geo-scientific questions concerning the developing technology in deep-water drilling, the changing nature of coastlines, rising sea levels, melting ice caps, and the geopolitical aspects associated with overlapping claims to lake and offshore maritime areas.
  • Through the publication of topical maritime boundary studies within defined research projects and contributions to international conferences, DOLFIN contributes to the wider dissemination of knowledge and developments concerning international maritime boundaries in lake and offshore areas.

Goals

  • Through the integration of international law, geoscience and diplomacy in a multi-disciplinary academic setting, to become a preeminent research, teaching and training platform for international maritime boundary delimitation and dispute resolution, thus creating impact and positively transforming the lives of those affected.
  • To offer impartial advice to interested National and International Energy Companies, Ministries of Foreign Affairs, Energy and Finance regarding processes and tools to enable boundary solutions to be reached. Through deployment of a “Neutrals” team, DOLFIN offers disputing Lake Countries Pieter- Bekker2and Coastal States as well as energy investors affected by maritime boundary disputes know-how tools for resolving 
    their disputes and for assessing investment risk through the application of cutting-edge scholarship and expertise reflecting the latest maritime boundary technology and legal principles (the Neutrals team works with, and operates based on the consent of, the disputing parties with a view to developing boundary solutions reflecting the latest technology and legal principles).
  •  The Neutrals are also available to serve as mediators or conciliators in respect of boundary disputes.
  • To promote the goals and principles of the Charter of the United Nations and the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea.

DOLFIN is supported by a special module entitled “Ocean and Lake Boundary Disputes: (E)merging Law and Science” featuring simulation exercises and applying law-of-the-sea software based on real-world situations, to be offered by DOLFIN’s Directors.‌ 

 

David-Attard

Patron: Prof. David J. Attard, D.Phil (Oxford), Vice-President of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS) in Hamburg and Director, IMO International Maritime Law Institute (IMLI), Malta.

  

 

Leadership & Neutrals Team

Pieter BekkerFounding Director: Prof. Dr. Pieter Bekker, LL.M. (Harvard) (CEPMLP Chair in International Law; Partner, CMS) (covering all LOS Legal Aspects)

Pieter Bekker (The Netherlands) is an internationally recognized expert in the Law of the Sea, especially maritime boundary delimitation issues and disputes, having served as a staff lawyer for the International Court of Justice (ICJ), the world’s preeminent body for adjudicating maritime boundary disputes, and having consulted on maritime boundary issues for the public and private sectors, including Coastal States and national and international energy companies. A member of the New York Bar and the Association of International Petroleum Negotiators (AIPN), Prof. Bekker has appeared before the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS), the UNCLOS adjudicatory body, as well as the ICJ and arbitral tribunals. He is the author of a number of law of the sea related publications and has lectured extensively on maritime boundary delimitation and dispute resolution both at the University of Dundee and internationally.

Contact: p.bekker@dundee.ac.uk

 

Robert van de PollGeology Director: Robert van de Poll, B.Sc., M.Sc.Eng. (CEPMLP Honorary Lecturer; Global Manager Law of the Sea, Fugro N.V.) (covering all LOS Scientific Aspects)

Robert van de Poll (Canada) is an internationally renowned geologist and engineer (geodesist) who has personally trained and worked with many of the Commissioners serving on the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf (CLCS), the UNCLOS body charged with reviewing claims to continental shelves extending beyond 200 nautical miles from a State’s coastline. He has conducted over 1400+ customized studies, regional seminars, workshops and hands-on training sessions (for Governments and national and international oil companies) relating to 138 of the 162 Coastal States that fall under his Global Territory for Fugro Group Worldwide. He designed, created and developed the CARIS LOTS (Law of the Sea) software for the United Nations and maintains a truly unique state-of-the-art database, the most complete global assemblage of relevant digital Law of the Sea data of its kind concerning A to Z Law of the Sea (all numbers reflected on this Web page are derived from the Fugro database (December 2016)). Mr. Van de Poll also teaches in the annual course offered by the IMO International Maritime Law Institute (IMLI) at the University of Malta.

 

Completed Projects

Global LOS Experience

Adjudicated Boundaries

1 Permanent Court Of Arbitration Maritime Boundary Ruling -  Norway-vs-Sweden (Grisbadarna) (October 1909)

1a Permanent Court Of Arbitration Maritime Boundary Ruling - Norway-vs-Sweden (Grisbadarna) (FRENCH October 1909)

2 International Court of Justice Maritime Boundary Ruling - Germany vs Netherlands & Germany vs Denmark  (February 1969)

2a International Court of Justice Maritime Boundary Ruling - Germany vs Netherlands & Germany vs Denmark (French February 1969)

3 Arbitral Tribunal Court Maritime Boundary Ruling -  Argentina vs Chile(Beagle Channel) (February 1977)

4 Arbitral Tribunal Court Maritime Boundary Ruling ~- UK vs France (Scilly Islands) (June 1977)

5 Arbitral Tribunal Court Maritime Boundary Ruling -  Emirate of Dubai  vs Emirate of Sharja (October 1981)

6 International Court of Justice Maritime Boundary Ruling - Canada vs USA (Gulf of Maine) (October 1984)

7 International Court of Justice Maritime Boundary Ruling -   Libya vs Malta (June 1985)

8 International Court of Justice Maritime Boundary Ruling - Tunisia vs Libya (December 1985)

9 Arbitral Tribunal Court Maritime Boundary Ruling - Guinea  vs Guinea-Bissau (February 1985)

10 Arbitral Tribunal Court Maritime Boundary Ruling - Canada  vs France (St. Pierre & Miquelon) (June 1992)

11 International Court of Justice Maritime Boundary Ruling - Denmark vs Norway (Jan Mayen) (June 1993)

12 Arbitral Tribunal Court Maritime Boundary Ruling - Eritrea-Yemen (Oct 1996)

12a Arbitral Tribunal Court Maritime Boundary Ruling - Eritrea-Yemen (Oct 1996)

12b Arbitral Tribunal Court Maritime Boundary Ruling - Eritrea-Yemen (1999) MAP

13 International Court of Justice Maritime Boundary Ruling - Qatar vs Bahrain (March 2001)

14 International Court of Justice Maritime Boundary Ruling - Cameroon vs Nigeria (October 2002)

15 Arbitral Tribunal Court Maritime Boundary Ruling - Barbados vs Trinidad & Tobago (April 2006)

16 Arbitral Tribunal Court Maritime Boundary Ruling - Guyana vs Suriname (September 2007)

17 International Court of Justice Maritime Boundary Ruling  - Nicaragua vs Honduras (October 2007)

18 International Court of Justice Maritime Boundary Ruling - Ukraine vs Romania (Feb 2009)

18a International Court of Justice Maritime Boundary Ruling - Ukraine vs Romania (May 2006)

18b International Court of Justice Maritime Boundary Ruling - Ukraine vs Romania (Sept 2008)

19 International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea Court Martime Boundary Ruling  - Bangladesh vs Myanmar (March 2012)

20 International Court of Justice Maritime Boundary Ruling -  Nicaragua vs Colombia (November 2012)

21 International Court of Justice Maritime Boundary Ruling -  Peru vs Chile  (January 2014)

22 Arbitral Tribunal Court Maritime Boundary Ruling-  Bangladesh vs India (July 2014)

23 Permanent Court ANNEX VII of Arbitration Ruling - China vs Philippines (July 2016)

24 PCA Final Award  Croatia vs Slovenia (29 June 2017)

25 ITLOS-SC Maritime Boundary Ruling Ghana vs Cote d'Ivoire (23 September 2017)