Skip to main content
"By creating we think, by living we learn" Patrick Geddes
Main University menu
 

Templates Top-Level Menu

Frequently Asked Questions Strategic Review

  1. Financial Climate
  2. Strategic Review
  3. Voluntary Severance
  4. Vision, Footprint & Structure
  5. Savings Suggestions

Financial Climate

The University is projecting a deficit of around £7M in 2011/12 -  what does that represent as a percentage of Scottish Funding Council income?

The University receives approximately £70M in SFC funding. The cuts will therefore represent a 10% reduction in 2011/12.

Will the changes to higher education funding in England and the reluctance of Scottish political parties to introduce a similar Graduate Contribution of between £6,000 to £9,000 mean that Scottish Universities will fall behind in terms of financial investment?

It is not in the interest of any Scottish Government to allow the Scottish HE Sector to fall behind the English system. A ‘Scottish Solution’ will have to be found that provides similar levels of funding. The balance between public funding and other contributions is still under debate. It is clear that funding in Scotland has to be maintained at a level commensurate with that in England, whatever the source of funding, whether by graduate contribution, public funding, or a combination of both or indeed by other additional means.

What does the University anticipate the future funding situation might be and will it be necessary to make further cuts?

The future funding position is unclear, as the SFC funding announcement only provides information for the next financial year. The May 2011 Scottish elections mean that future budget plans are unknown. It is anticipated that the next Scottish Government will need to introduce a ‘Scottish Solution’ in time for the 2012/13 academic year student intake to align with the introduction of the Graduate Tax in England.

The projected deficit for 2011/12 anticipates that growth in our income streams will continue at the levels achieved over recent years. How realistic is this?

Our ability to grow income streams will be challenging, particularly in the areas of overseas taught postgraduate fees and research overhead recovery. However, our focus on excellence and investment in building `critical mass’ within the key themes identified in the Strategic Review will give the University the best opportunity to compete for funding and attract students to our high quality teaching and research programmes.

Strategic Review

It is said that savings must be accelerated - to what extent and by when?

The Strategic Review initially anticipated £10 million of savings being achieved over the next three years, through a reduction in staffing of 193 Full-Time-Equivalent posts. The Government spending cuts mean that these savings now have to be delivered, as far as possible, in the year 2011-12. Current indications are that we may achieve £6-7M of these savings and so we are encouraging those still considering making an application for VS to come forward before the 28th February closing date.

Will the introduction of a ‘Scottish Solution’ (Graduate Contribution) negate the need for the Strategic Review savings?

No, what has happened in England indicates that future income from a Graduate Contribution is likely to be matched by a further reduction in Government/public funding.

Do you genuinely believe at this stage that sufficient VS applications will be approved to meet the required savings?

In the past we have seen people holding off making a VS application until close to the expiry date of the scheme so we would not be surprised if this happens again on this occasion.  It is hoped the VS scheme will make a major contribution to the savings required but this will not preclude the need for all Schools and Directorates to look for additional savings and efficiencies and it is the combination of these that we hope will enable us to meet the savings needed.

How will we know if our area of the University has met its allocated savings target or not and whether our posts may be at risk?

A paper was submitted to University Court on the 21st February 2011 that broke down the anticipated savings against the savings targets. This information will be updated at the beginning of March and made available to Deans and Directors.

If our area of the University is going to meet its savings target, will our posts be secure from future risk?

Obviously the uncertainty over funding and income streams in future years means that there can be no guarantee over future job security. However, the next stage of Strategic Review will focus on the areas that have not achieved the necessary savings.

Can we assume that, if we do not meet the savings, the University will move towards compulsory redundancies?

That cannot be assumed.  Only the governing body of the University, the University Court, can make that decision and no such decision has been made.  Initially, Court will be looking to see the extent of savings made as a result of VS and other efficiency measures and if the savings have still not been met it will consider a range of options  Compulsory redundancy cannot be ruled out, but neither should it be assumed that it is the option Court will automatically select. The University is close to agreement on an Avoidance of Redundancy Policy.

Voluntary Severance

I want to continue working if I can, but if compulsory redundancy in my area is a possibility it might be to my advantage to apply for VS.  How can I decide to go for VS if I don't have the information on how my School or Directorate will be affected by SR?

It is not known at this stage the extent to which the savings will be met or what action Court will decide upon if they are not met.  The decision as to whether to apply for VS or not must therefore primarily be a personal one depending on your own wishes, preferences and circumstances. Information on the strategic plans for the future of a School or Directorate should be sought from the relevant Dean or Director.

How far in advance is it possible to apply for VS - is 3 years possible?

So far most applications have been within a 12 month horizon, but this does not exclude the possibility of applications being made beyond that timeframe although 3 years is likely to be further out than the University is seeking.  If anyone wishes to apply using a projected date either for full, partial or phased VS they should provide a range of dates they are prepared to consider or say they are prepared to discuss a mutually suitable date.  All VS applications, irrespective of the applicants preferred date, will be carefully considered.

How would phased VS affect my pension entitlement?

You would need to discuss your own (planned) particular circumstances with the Pensions Officer, Marion Imrie, who is the only person who should be giving staff guidance on how their pension scheme arrangements will affect them.  Marion is very happy to meet with individuals on a confidential basis to allow them to explore the questions they have.

Will the VS scheme be extended?

When the VS scheme was set up the decision was made to offer it for a defined period up to the end of February 2011.  This is the reason we are promoting the VS scheme now to ensure that no-one misses their opportunity to apply for the very favourable terms on offer.  So, at this stage, it is not intended to extend the VS scheme, although ultimately this will be for Court to decide.

Is the University going to reopen the VS Scheme some time in the future if it does not achieve the necessary level of savings?

The decision to reopen the VS Scheme is a matter for the University Court to consider. However, the University currently has no intention to reopen the VS Scheme to everyone. The more likely action will be to have a more a targeted VS Scheme for a very limited period, which will focus on specific areas of the University where the Strategic Review savings targets have not been achieved.

If there are compulsory redundancies in future will there be an enhanced package on offer (like VS) or will only Statutory Redundancy Pay be paid?

When the University has to deal with redundancy situations, for example, the expiry of fixed-term contracts, it is Statutory Redundancy Pay that is paid and it is unlikely that we would depart from this approach in the future.

Are the 90 VS applications awaiting a decision - and the 58 approved applications - based on Full-time-equivalent (FTE) numbers or a head count of staff?

These figures represent head count and include a number of partial reductions in FTEs. The University is still seeking a significant number of applications to meet the savings target.

Does the 75 FTE saving target allocated to the SASS Directorates include any non-pay savings and will there be a requirement for more FTEs if a proportionately large number of lower paid staff were to apply for VS?

The SASS savings target includes approximately £1.5M of non-pay savings and a very robust 2011/12 budget build process from a zero base. The trend in applications so far indicates a broad range of applications across all the staff grades.

Vision, Footprint and Structure

Is the University to close Departments?

The Strategic Review paper discussed at University Court on 13thDecember 2010 and at Senate on the 9th February 2011 provides information on the need to review the academic footprint and vision for the future. This will be developed over the coming months and will take into consideration the future funding environment and other influencing factors. The University will need to reshape itself to enable it to remain competitive and continue to achieve excellence in research and teaching.

What is the future for academic staff who are carrying out research in areas that are not aligned to the four themes identified as priorities for future development by the University?

The four themes have been identified as areas for focus and development; they are also multi-disciplinary in scope, intended to bring together a wide range of research areas from across the institution. Individual areas are encouraged to develop their own ideas about how their work might be aligned to the emerging themes; this is an opportunity to build new and exciting relationships across disciplinary boundaries. This notwithstanding, the University remains committed to supporting all 3 and 4 star research, alongside rising 2 star activity in key areas.

How can University staff influence decisions on the development of the four themes and any future changes in the academic footprint or structure?

Staff are encouraged to actively take part in the future consultation and discussion on the future vision for the University and its development. School Boards. College Boards, Academic Council, Senate and University Court are formal routes to input to the discussion. Staff can also express their views through their line management, Deans, Directors, College Secretaries or College Heads.

Savings Suggestions

If staff have ideas and suggestions on how the University may be able to achieve the necessary savings, who can they communicate them to?

Staff may pass on or discuss suggestions for savings opportunities with their line manager, College Secretary, Dean or Head of College. Alternatively they can email their suggestion to SavingsSuggestions@dundee.ac.uk