“By creating we think, by living we learn” Patrick Geddes
Black bar DHSRU top bit
 Division of Clinical & Population Sciences & Education »
 Dental Health Services & Research Unit »

Publications

Scottish Health Boards' Dental Epidemiological Programme

Report of the 1996/97 Survey of 12 Year Old Children

Appendices

Appendix A Personnel involved in the survey
Appendix BThe Training and Calibration Courses
Appendix CInter and Intra-examiner Agreement
Appendix DComparison of D3MFT and D3S in 1994/95 and 1998/99 with confidence limits
Appendix ETooth and Surface Caries Results
Appendix FDental Trauma
Appendix GOral Cleanliness
Appendix HSCOTS Index for Developmental Defects of Enamel
Appendix IOrthodontic Assessment
Appendix JCodes used for assessment of caries and sealants
Appendix KAbbreviations used for Health Boards
Appendix LMaps of D3MFT results for 14 year olds in Scotland, 1994/95 and 1998/99
Appendix MMap of D3MFT results for 14 year olds in the UK, 1994/95

List of Tables

C1 Inter-dentist agreement from calibration trial
C2 Intra-dentist agreement from survey
E1 Caries data, by surface, for each Health Board
E2 Distribution of decay by tooth surface
F1 Dental trauma
G1 Mean plaque scores and distribution by Health Board
H1 Frequency of demarcated opactities, diffuse opacities and hypoplasias
H2 Extent and symmetry of developmental defects
H3 Frequency of individual SCOTS2/DDE classifications by Health Board
I1 Orthodontic treatment need, by Health Board, measured by IOTN
I2 Proportion of children with orthodontic treatment need, by Health Board.
I3 Proportion of children with orthodontic treatment need, by DEPCAT score

List of Figures

D1 Comparison of D3MFT in 1994/95 and 1998/99 with confidence limits
D2 Comparison of D3S in 1994/95 and 1998/99 with confidence limits
E1 Distribution of caries experience (D3 and F) by surface
L1 Map of D3MFT results for 14 year olds in Scotland (by Health Board) 1995/95
L2 Map of D3MFT results for 14 year olds in Scotland (by Health Board) 1998/99
M1 Map of D3MFT results for 14 year olds in Great Britain, 1994/95

Appendix A

Appendix A Participants in the 1998-99 Survey of 14 year olds

Consultants DPH/CADOs (or their representatives) Health Board
Mr P Sweeney Argyll & Clyde
* Ayrshire & Arran
Mr G Ball Borders
* Dumfries & Galloway
Mr G Ball Fife
Mr P Sweeney Forth Valley
Mr M C W Merrett Grampian
Mr D McCall Greater Glasgow
* Highland
Miss M Taylor Lanarkshire
Mr G Ball Lothian
Mrs M Nelson Orkney
Mr M Collins Shetland
Mr M C W Merrett Tayside
Mrs C MacMillan Western Isles
* No current incumbent  

Health Board Coordinators Health Board
Mr A C Gerrish Argyll & Clyde
Mr A J Swan Ayrshire & Arran
Mr D W Clouting Borders
Miss L S Gilliat Dumfries & Galloway
Mrs J Logan Fife
Mr R Maxwell Forth Valley
Mr R Hamilton Grampian
Mr A Kippen Greater Glasgow
Mrs C Lush Highland
Mr Martin Foster Larkshire
Mrs C Wight Lothianan
Mrs M Nelson Orkney
Mr M Collins Shetland
Miss M M T Curnow Tayside
Mrs C MacMillan Western Isles

Dental Examiners / Scribes Health Board
Mrs L Baker / Mrs M Hutchinson Argyll & Clyde
Mr R Lawson/ Miss A Campbell Argyll & Clyde
Mr D Watson / Mrs J Simpson Argyll & Clyde
Mr A Swan / Ms M Riddex Ayrshire & Arran
Mrs C Anderson / Miss A Richardson Borders
Mrs M Land / Mrs L Dumper Borders
Miss C Oliver/ Mrs K Paxton Dumfries & Galloway
Mr A Donaldson / Miss S Gorman Dumfries & Galloway
Mrs J Logan / Miss E Pye Fife
Mr S Watt / Mrs H Mcdonnel Fife
Mr R Maxwell / Mrs M Lornie Forth Valley
Mrs M Macdonald / Mrs E Kerr Forth Valley
Miss C Doran / Ms D Lawson Grampian
Mr R Stuart / Ms M Nicol Grampian
Mrs M Barr / Mrs J Strong Greater Glasgow
Miss T Dunseith / Mrs J McInnes Greater Glasgow
Mrs D Pitts/ Mrs A Heaney Greater Glasgow
Mrs R Walker / Ms H Dickie Greater Glasgow
Mr C Williams / Miss L Toal Greater Glasgow
Mrs D Macadam / Mrs F Campbell Greater Glasgow
Mr P Dunford / Mrs A Robb Highland
Mrs C Temple / Mrs I Clark Highland
Mrs M Kerr / Mrs M Brown Lanarkshire
Mr J Sinclair / Mrs S Dorian Lanarkshire
Mr M Foster / Mrs A Kerr Lanarkshire
Mr J Morrison / Miss J Kerr Lanarkshire
Mrs Y Millar / Mrs M Hope Lanarkshire
Miss M Campbell / Miss M Banks Lothian
Mr J McConnachie / Mrs M Slane Lothian
Mr D Sampson / Miss M Murdie Lothian
Mrs M Nelson / Ms S Leask Orkney
Mr M Collins / Ms C Balfour Shetland
Miss M Curnow / Mrs B Ritchie Tayside
Miss G Macaulay / Miss C Shand Tayside
Mr G Jackson / Ms K MacDonald Western Isles

Calibration Course Staff Title
Mr M C W Merrett
(Tayside Health Board)
Organiser
Prof N B Pitts
(Dental Health Services Research Unit)
Coordinator
Dr C Pine
(Dental Health Services Research Unit)
Examiner Training
Prof K W Stephen
(Glasgow Dental Hospital and School)
Adviser
Ms P A Smith
(Dental Health Services Research Unit)
Organisation, Data Collection and Calibration
Mrs A Byres
(Unit of Dental Public Health & Health Psychology)
Data Collection and Calibration
Mrs L Ellis
(Dental Health Services Research Unit)
Data Collection and Calibration
Ms K Finlay
(Dental Health Services Research Unit)
Data Collection and Calibration
Dr Z J Nugent
(Dental Health Services Research Unit)
Data Collection and Calibration
Mrs G Topping
(Dental Health Services Research Unit)
Data Collection and Calibration

Organisational assistance was provided by staff of the Community Dental Health Service, Perth and Kinross Healthcare NHS Trust.

Data Processing Unit
Dr Z J Nugent (Dental Health Services Research Unit)
Data Entry
Mrs T Schmid (Dental Health Services Research Unit)
Analyses and Report Preparation
Dr Z J Nugent (Dental Health Services Research Unit)
Prof N B Pitts (Dental Health Services Research Unit)
Ms P A Smith (Dental Health Services Research Unit)

Back to top


Appendix B

Appendix B The Training and Calibration Courses

The training and calibration courses for this third survey of 14 year old children were held in Perth as it was considered to be a good central location accessible to all the other areas from which the examining teams have to travel and has proved to offer excellent facilities and schools for this exercise over many years.

In order to achieve meaningful results in a calibration assessment it is important that there is an appreciable level of disease, in the subjects being examined, for the dentists to diagnose.

The large number of people involved in the training and calibration courses makes it necessary to run two separate two-day courses. The first course was held on the 26th and 27th of October 1998 and the second was held, later that same week, on the 29th and 30th of October. Both courses were held in a hotel in Perth and followed the basic schedule previously used. Illustrated training lessons on the codes and criteria were followed by discussion sessions. Clinical training was undertaken on the morning of the second day, using children at Perth Grammar School. Calibration took place in the afternoon and was followed by a final discussion session. The course organiser was Mr MCW Merrett and the training elements were provided by Dr Cynthia Pine and the Dental Health Services Research Unit.

Perth Grammar School (Rector, Mr D Bader) kindly agreed to allow the training and calibration courses to take place on its premises. Without the cooperation of the children, their parents and the staff at the school, the training and calibration courses would not have been possible. The Scottish Health BoardsÕ Dental Epidemiological Programme is grateful to them all.

Back to top


Appendix C Inter and intra-examiner Aggreement

Table C1 Inter-dentist agreement from calibration trial.


Group A1 A2 B1 B2
Number of Dentists 9 6 9 10
Number of Subjects (DMFT)* 7 9 10 10
Number of Subjects (Kappa) 8-10 9-10 10 10
DT
Mean 1.10 1.31 1.54 0.84
Standard Deviation 0.33 0.58 0.34 0.38
Range 0.71-1.71 0.78-2.22 1.20-2.30 0.50-1.80
Coefficient of Variation** 0.30 0.44 0.22 0.46
MT
Mean 1.03 0.35 0.30 0.65
Standard Deviation 0.16 0.19 0 0.14
Range 0.86-1.29 0.11-0.56 0.40-0.80
Coefficient of Variation 0.15 0.54 0.22
FT
Mean 1.10 1.85 1.47 0.87
Standard Deviation 0.31 0.28 0.05 0.12
Range 0.57-1.57 1.56-2.33 1.40-1.50 0.70-1.00
Coefficient of Variation 0.28 0.15 0.03 0.13
DMFT
Mean 3.22 3.52 3.31 2.36
Standard Deviation 0.27 0.54 0.35 0.40
Range 2.86-3.57 2.89-4.33 2.90-4.10 1.80-3.20
Coefficient of Variation 0.08 0.15 0.11 0.17
Kappa (surfaces)
Mean 0.79 0.77 0.88 0.82
Standard Deviation 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.05
Range 0.69-.092 0.70-0.88 0.80-0.95 0.68-0.93
Kappa (teeth)
Mean 0.78 0.72 0.87 0.79
Standard Deviation 0.06 0.08 0.06 0.07
Range 0.66-0.93 0.61-0.86 0.74-0.95 0.62-0.95

* Only children seen by all dentists in the group have data included in D3MFT

 equation

Table C2 Intra-dentist agreement as assessed by Kappa and Dice Similarity measure (D3=decayed, F=filled, value of 1 denotes perfect agreement and value of 0 denotes no agreement).
Dentist No. Subjects Examined Teeth Surfaces
Kappa Dice Kappa Dice
D F D F
1 17 1 1 1 0.99 1 1
2 11 0.98 0.95 1 0.98 0.97 1
3 17 0.97 1 0.97 0.98 1 0.97
4 28 0.97 1 0.97 0.99 0.97 0.98
5 11 1 1 1 1 1 1
6 13 1 1 1 1 1 1
7 8 0.93 0.80 0.93 0.95 0.86 0.92
8 11 0.89 1 0.83 0.92 1 0.70
9 24 0.99 0.97 0.99 0.98 0.98 0.99
10 19 1 1 1 0.99 0.95 1
12 7 0.96 1 0.94 0.99 1 0.96
13 14 0.93 0.87 0.95 0.98 0.88 0.98
14 17 0.94 0.89 0.95 0.96 0.83 0.96
15 14 0.89 0.67 1 0.96 0.63 1
16 35 0.98 0.95 0.97 0.98 0.93 0.98
17 14 0.93 0.86 0.98 0.96 0.80 0.96
19 16 1 1 1 0.99 1 0.98
20 15 0.97 0.67 1 0.99 0.80 1
21 12 1 1 1 0.97 1 0.98
22 16 0.99 1 1 0.99 0.99 1
23 14 1 1 1 0.96 1 0.99
24 22 0.99 0.98 0.98 0.99 0.99 0.98
25 19 1 1 1 0.99 0.97 1
26 21 1 1 1 0.99 1 1
27 24 1 1 1 0.99 1 0.99
28 18 0.96 0.87 0.97 0.96 0.92 0.96
29 16 0.88 0.77 0.89 0.97 0.81 0.96
30 15 1 1 1 0.98 0.98 0.99
31 22 0.98 0.94 1 0.95 0.96 0.97
32 21 0.87 0.85 0.93 0.97 0.89 0.92
33 22 0.97 0.95 1 0.99 0.95 1
34 24 0.99 0.97 1 0.99 0.96 0.98
35 27 1 1 1 0.99 1 1
36 26 1 1 1 0.99 1 1

Back to top


Append D

Appendix D Comparison of D3MFT and D3 in 1994/95 and 1998/99 with confidence limits

Figure D1 Decayed, missing and filled teeth (D3MFT) in14 year old Scottish children in 1994/95 and 1998/99 - a comparison showing mean values and estimated 95% confidence limits

Figure D1

Figure D2 Decayed surfaces (D3S) in14 year old Scottish children in 1994/95 and 1998/99 - a comparison showing mean values and estimated 95% confidence limits

Figure D2

Back to top


Appendix E Tooth and Surface Caries Results

Table E1 Mean number of surfaces decayed (D3S), missing* (MS), filled** (FS), sealed ($S) and with sealant restorations (NS), per child for each Health Board. [decay defined as decay into dentine].
Health Board DS MS FS DFS $S NS
Argyll & Clyde 1.27 1.80 2.87 4.14 2.37 0.07
Ayrshire & Arran 0.92 1.43 2.90 3.82 2.05 0.00
Borders 0.63 0.38 1.40 2.03 1.24 0.01
Dumfries & Galloway 1.15 1.37 2.24 3.39 1.65 0.00
Fife 1.33 1.45 3.19 4.53 2.11 0.02
Forth Valley 0.77 0.71 2.12 2.89 2.93 0.03
Grampian 0.90 1.72 2.18 3.08 1.31 0.00
Greater Glasgow 2.36 2.02 3.37 5.73 1.97 0.06
Highland 3.14 1.51 2.30 5.44 2.96 0.00
Lanarkshire 1.77 1.04 3.38 5.15 2.20 0.04
Lothian 1.33 0.94 1.54 2.88 1.91 0.02
Orkney 0.83 0.54 0.98 1.81 5.93 0.03
Shetland 0.95 0.40 1.85 2.80 6.40 0.06
Tayside 1.61 1.28 2.74 4.35 2.47 0.01
Western Isles 1.26 1.06 3.82 5.09 3.69 0.20
Scotland (weighted values) 1.53 1.40 2.67 4.20 2.14 0.03

* 4 surfaces are counted for a missing anterior and 5 for a posterior tooth.
** Filled surfaces include codes F, N and R.



Table E2 Distribution of decay by tooth surface (m=mesial, o=occlusal, d=distal, b=buccal, l=lingual): total decay (D3) and filled (F) as % of total D3FS, by Health Board. [decay defined as decay into dentine].
Health Board m-D o-D d-D b-D l-D m-F o-F d-F b-F l-F
Argyll & Clyde 5.5 11.7 3.9 4.4 5.2 10.3 36.9 9.0 6.0 7.2
Ayrshire & Arran 3.3 8.7 3.3 3.9 4.8 11.1 40.2 7.6 7.9 9.1
Borders 3.8 19.9 1.4 2.6 3.6 9.5 37.4 5.4 8.5 8.0
Dumfries & Galloway 5.0 13.1 4.2 6.1 5.4 9.1 37.4 6.1 7.0 6.6
Fife 4.8 9.6 3.8 4.8 6.4 10.2 37.1 7.4 6.5 9.5
Forth Valley 4.0 9.6 4.2 4.0 4.8 10.2 33.3 8.2 11.5 10.1
Grampian 4.2 10.9 2.5 6.0 5.7 12.1 34.1 8.2 7.7 8.6
Greater Glasgow 7.3 14.4 5.5 6.8 7.3 8.1 27.9 6.6 8.1 8.1
Highland 6.8 25.1 6.4 7.4 11.9 5.0 21.1 4.8 6.5 4.8
Lanarkshire 4.6 14.5 3.9 4.9 6.4 8.7 36.7 6.1 6.8 7.3
Lothian 5.4 24.2 5.0 5.8 6.0 6.4 32.1 4.0 5.4 5.7
Orkney 8.4 20.0 7.7 4.4 5.5 5.1 29.9 4.2 7.7 7.3
Shetland 6.1 12.5 4.3 5.5 5.5 8.5 36.5 5.9 9.4 5.7
Tayside 5.0 17.0 3.0 4.2 7.8 9.8 32.3 7.6 7.1 6.2
Western Isles 5.0 9.0 3.7 4.2 2.9 11.3 37.0 9.0 9.0 8.8
Scotland (weighted values) 5.2 14.8 4.2 5.3 6.4 9.1 33.5 6.8 7.3 7.6


Figure E1 Distribution of caries experience (D3 and F) by surface.
 Figure E1

Back to top


Appendix F Dental Trauma

Data were collected on tooth fractures (repaired and not repaired) and discolouration of intact teeth due to trauma. Additionally, full crowns on incisors and canines were recorded. Only data from permanent teeth were included. In Table F1, the column headed "Any Trauma" represents the proportion of the sample (male or female) with any or all of the fractures, discolouration or trauma repairs.

More males than females had untreated fractures (P<0.001); more males than females had any trauma (treated or untreated) (P<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the frequency of repaired trauma or of discolouration.

Table F1 Proportion of 14 year olds affected by trauma (treated and untreated) or having crowns on incisors or canines.
MALE
Health Board Repair Discolouration Fracture Any Trauma Crown
Argyll & Clyde 5.1 0.5 5.6 10.3 1.9
Ayrshire & Arran 1.4 0 7.4 8.8 0
Borders 4.7 0 3.1 7.9 0
Dumfries & Galloway 1.7 0 1.7 3.4 0
Fife 3.4 0 2.0 5.4 1.4
Forth Valley 2.8 0 2.1 4.9 1.4
Grampian 4.0 0 4.7 8.7 0
Greater Glasgow 3.0 0.6 4.5 7.6 0.7
Highland 6.3 0 6.9 12.5 0
Lanarkshire 1.5 0.8 6.3 8.3 0.8
Lothian 4.8 0 3.6 8.4 0.3
Orkney 4.1 0 1.7 5.8 0.8
Shetland 4.8 0 0.8 5.6 1.6
Tayside 3.1 0 2.5 5.6 2.5
Western Isles 4.9 0 1.6 6.6 0
Scotland (weighted means) 3.4 0.2 4.5 7.9 0.8
FEMALE
Health Board Repair Discolouration Fracture Any Trauma Crown
Argyll & Clyde 4.2 0.4 2.9 6.7 1.3
Ayrshire & Arran 2.9 0 5.1 8.0 0
Borders 5.8 0 0 5.8 0
Dumfries & Galloway 2.4 0 0 2.4 0.8
Fife 2.6 0 1.6 4.2 0.5
Forth Valley 1.6 0 0.8 2.4 2.4
Grampian 0.9 0 2.7 3.6 0
Greater Glasgow 2.0 0 2.5 4.5 1.8
Highland 3.7 0 1.9 5.6 0.6
Lanarkshire 2.7 0.7 3.7 6.2 0.2
Lothian 4.0 0 0.9 4.6 0.6
Orkney 2.3 0 1.5 3.8 0
Shetland 2.9 0 0.7 2.9 0
Tayside 2.6 0.5 2.6 4.6 0
Western Isles 5.4 0 2.7 6.8 1.4
Scotland (weighted means) 2.8 0.2 2.4 5.0 0.8

Back to top


Appendix G Oral Cleanliness

Table G1 Mean plaque scores and distribution of total plaque scores for each Health Board
Health Board Mean SD Valid
Cases
% of children with each total plaque score* Valid
Cases
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Argyll & Clyde 0.35 0.36 449 41 15 12 7 6 9 11 366
Ayrshire & Arran 0.38 0.35 283 34 13 10 14 13 6 11 238
Borders 0.22 0.32 248 61 10 10 4 6 3 7 230
Dumfries & Galloway 0.24 0.34 246 57 12 8 4 7 6 6 211
Fife 0.25 0.34 339 55 10 12 8 4 2 8 298
Forth Valley 0.20 0.31 267 58 17 6 7 3 1 7 237
Grampian 0.15 0.24 261 63 17 10 4 4 1 2 222
Greater Glasgow 0.30 0.33 1094 42 17 13 10 8 5 6 863
Highland 0.24 0.29 304 48 15 14 12 6 2 4 256
Lanarkshire 0.19 0.29 801 61 14 8 7 4 2 5 658
Lothian 0.20 0.31 648 59 12 11 5 6 1 5 550
Orkney 0.18 0.26 251 53 17 14 7 4 3 3 234
Shetland 0.10 0.21 265 74 10 8 4 4 1 0 253
Tayside 0.35 0.32 355 31 17 19 11 11 8 5 314
Western Isles 0.46 0.41 136 33 14 11 9 4 4 25 117
Scotland (weighted values) 0.26 0.33 50 14 11 8 6 4 6

Notes:

Back to top


Appendix H Developmental Defects of Enamel (SCOTS2/DDE)

The SCOTS version of the Developmental Defects of Enamel Index was designed for use in field settings as an add-on to caries prevalence examinations in order to monitor prevalence of (and to determine public health significance of) enamel defects. Designed initially for Scottish Health Boards, it includes a Child's assessment of the presence of any defect, describes Opacities/Hypoplasias using modified DDE screening criteria and includes a grading of extents in Thirds and records Symmetry of defects.

For the 1996/97 survey of 12 year olds the SCOTS/DDE Index was updated (SCOTS2) so that the grading of thirds for the extent of defects was recorded separately for each of the four teeth examined. In addition, the impact of defects was determined by reference to an example "impact" picture of anterior teeth previously evaluated elsewhere.

For the examination, assessment was made of developmental defects of the upper four incisor teeth, examined wet, and anomalies smaller than 1mm were excluded. The examiner asked the child "Do you have any marks on your front teeth which won't brush off?" and, if the answer was affirmative, invited him/her to point them out. This was followed up by the question "Does the appearance of these marks bother you?". The clinical examination was then carried out; the presence of opacities and/or hypoplasias and their maximum extent was noted and the symmetry of opacities was assessed.

Table H1 shows the frequencies of the three types of anomalies in each Health Board. There are clear differences reported between Boards with, for example, the values for demarcated opacities ranging from 5.6% to 34%. The overall value for Scotland rose moderately from 11.5% to 13.9% since the last survey of 14 year olds.

The frequencies of SCOTS2 classification, by Health Board are presented in Table H3. There has been no substantial change in the percentage of children free of developmental defects of enamel, the percentage of demarcated opacities has risen slightly from 7.9% to 10.3% and the percentage of diffuse opacities has dropped slightly. Of those with diffuse opacities (Code 2) only a small percentage (10.5%) were sufficiently prominent to exceed the severity of the "impact slide" (impact score=1) representing lay awareness of any abnormality.

It is important to note that the variation in values between the 1994/95 and 1998/99 surveys may relate, in part, to examiner variability and that Tables H1 to H3 offer only a broad indication of the levels of developmental defects of enamel in these children. Additionally, as mentioned earlier, since the last survey of 14 year olds the method of calculating the extent of defects has been modified in SCOTS2.

Table H1 Percentage of children with demarcated opacities, diffuse opacities, and hypoplasias on upper incisors, by Health Board (This is tooth data and all 4 incisors counted.)
Health Board Demarcated Opacities Diffuse Opacities children with diffuse opacities who had Hypoplasisias Sample
Impact Score=1 Symetrical opacities
Argyll & Clyde 12.1 7.5 12.5 71.9 0.5 438
Ayrshire & Arran 6.1 22.5 3.3 82.0 1.4 280
Borders 12.6 12.6 20.0 73.3 3.8 239
Dumfries & Galloway 21.9 14.0 12.1 93.9 0.0 242
Fife 6.9 17.7 32.1 62.5 1.9 317
Forth Valley 12.0 29.5 6.8 86.3 1.2 251
Grampian 8.4 12.7 15.6 78.1 1.2 251
Greater Glasgow 20.1 20.5 7.0 80.1 1.8 1036
Highland 34.0 26.3 1.3 78.9 2.0 297
Lanarkshire 11.3 9.9 16.4 75.3 0.9 760
Lothian 19.0 19.5 13.4 75.4 1.8 609
Orkney 18.3 28.8 4.3 75.4 3.8 240
Shetland 5.6 26.2 13.8 61.5 2.0 248
Tayside 6.5 14.2 4.2 62.5 1.2 338
Western Isles 16.2 13.2 16.7 77.8 5.1 136
Scotland (weighted values) 13.9 17.0 10.5 76.9 1.4


Table H2 Percentage of observations with each extent of defect (measured in thirds of crown surface) with a combination of defects not included.
Extent Sample
Developmental Defect < 1/3 1/3 - 2/3 > 2/3
Demarcated Opacities 96.4 3.5 0.1 1042
Diffuse Opacities 75.5 19.7 4.8 2253
Hypoplasias 72.1 22.1 5.8 86


Table H3 Frequencies of SCOT2 classifications by Health Board (each individual is scored for the highest single value (excluding 9) assigned.)
% Normal % Demarcated % Diffuse % Hypoplasia % Combination of defects
SCOTS2/DDE Index 0 1 2 3 4 - 7
Health Board
Argyll & Clyde 80.4 11.2 6.8 0.5 1.1
Ayrshire & Arran 71.1 5.4 21.8 1.4 0.4
Borders 76.2 9.2 9.6 1.7 3.3
Dumfries & Galloway 67.4 18.6 11.6 0 2.5
Fife 76.7 5.0 16.1 0 2.2
Forth Valley 62.9 6.8 26.3 0.8 3.2
Grampian 81.7 4.8 10.4 0.8 2.4
Greater Glasgow 63.9 14.6 16.5 1.1 4.0
Highland 50.5 21.5 19.5 0.3 8.1
Lanarkshire 80.3 9.2 8.4 0.4 1.7
Lothian 65.0 14.1 16.7 1.1 3.0
Orkney 59.6 10.8 20.4 0.4 8.8
Shetland 72.2 0.8 21.8 1.6 3.6
Tayside 80.2 5.6 12.7 0.3 1.2
Western Isles 69.1 13.2 10.3 5.1 2.2
Scotland (weighted values) 71.7 10.3 14.6 0.8 2.6
Health Boards % with SCOTS2 code 1-7 who were aware of marrks on their teeth* Sample
Argyll & Clyde 44.0 438
Ayrshire & Arran 28.4 280
Borders 36.8 239
Dumfries & Galloway 30.4 242
Fife 39.2 317
Forth Valley 19.6 251
Grampian 37.0 251
Greater Glasgow 29.0 1036
Highland 24.3 297
Lanarkshire 30.2 760
Lothian 21.1 609
Orkney 30.9 240
Shetland 34.8 248
Tayside 22.4 338
Western Isles 33.3 136

* Based on those for whom an answer was available.

Back to top


Appendix I Orthodontic Assessment

This is the first of the surveys of 14 year olds in which an orthodontic assessment has been undertaken and therefore provides baseline figures with which future surveys' results can be compared

The Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN), used in this survey, facilitates assessment of both objective (professionally defined) and subjective (patient defined) need. If a child is assigned a score of 8 or more on the Aesthetic Component of the Index or a score of 1 on the Dental Health Component (DHC) then that child will be classed as having an objective need for orthodontic treatment

Subjective need for orthodontic treatment is determined by the answers to the following three questions:

  1. Have you got a brace?
  2. Are you satisfied with your teeth the way they are or would you prefer to have them straightened?
  3. Are you willing to wear a brace?

with the following combination of answers: 1. "No"; 2. "Not satisfied"; 3. "Yes", indicating a subjective need for orthodontic treatment.

Table I1 shows the proportion of children by Health Board classified as having an objective need for orthodontic treatment. Less than a third of the 14 year olds (28%) were classified as having a need for orthodontic treatment on dental health grounds (DHC=1), although this figure varied across Scotland from 22% to 46%. A small proportion (8.8%) of those examined were recorded as having an aesthetic need for orthodontic treatment (Aesthetic Component > 8) and less than 1% of 14 year olds were classified as having an aesthetic need for orthodontic treatment which was not associated with a dental health need (Aesthetic Component > 8 but DHC=0).

The first column of Table I2 indicates the proportion of the total sample who currently have an appliance. The proportions with need (central three columns) are based on the sub-sample without appliances. The final column has, as a base, the subjects with both subjective and objective need and presents the proportion of these who say they are awaiting orthodontic treatment.

Table I3 presents this data for the different DEPCAT categories. Clearly, less deprived children are more likely to be in treatment or awaiting treatment. There is no clear relationship between deprivation and need in untreated 14 year olds.

Table I1 Orthodontic need by Health Board, as measured by IOTN.
Health Board % with Aesthetic Component >=8 % with malocclusion at DHC=1 % with Aesthetic Component >=8 but DHC=0 % with malocclusion at DHC=1 or AC >=8 who would like teeth straightened (no brace at present) % with malocclusion at DHC=1 or AC >=8 who would like teeth straightened (no brace at present) but don't want a brace
Argyll & Clyde 9.7 31.6 0.2 54.9 4.1
Ayrshire & Arran 7.7 31.1 1.4 45.7 6.3
Borders 10.1 22.0 0.9 44.2 5.3
Dumfries & Galloway 14.6 24.2 1.3 48.9 17.4
Fife 9.0 31.0 1 47.7 5.0
Forth Valley 8.8 22.4 0 50.0 4.2
Grampian 1.5 28.0 0 46.6 14.8
Greater Glasgow 9.6 30.7 0.7 37.9 10.1
Highland 19.6 28.4 2.5 42.9 0
Lanarkshire 8.7 27.4 0.3 55.2 5.3
Lothian 13.5 24.2 1.1 56.7 7.4
Orkney 7.5 34.6 0 43.6 8.8
Shetland 15.7 35.3 0.9 56.3 0
Tayside 1.2 23.4 0 56.5 15.4
Western Isles 5.2 45.9 0 26.4 14.3
Scotland (weighted values) 8.8 28.0 0.7 48.5 7.8
Percentages based on those for whom a valid value could be recorded for each variable used.


Table I2 Percentage of children with an appliance, those with need and no appliance (both subjective and objective), and those with need waiting for an appliance.
Health Board % with Appliance % with No Appliance
% Subjective Need % Objective Need % Both % Waiting with Both
Argyll & Clyde 7.1 23.3 30.0 14.0 58.7
Ayrshire & Arran 18.2 18.4 26.0 10.5 13.3
Borders 11.4 17.4 19.9 7.3 33.3
Dumfries & Galloway 14.8 17.2 20.2 7.4 44.4
Fife 14.8 19.0 26.6 9.8 42.4
Forth Valley 14.6 20.5 18.4 8.8 56.5
Grampian 10.9 15.2 22.6 7.4 57.9
Greater Glasgow 14.6 16.1 26.0 8.1 40.2
Highland 14.2 18.4 26.7 10.1 40.0
Lanarkshire 18.6 18.1 21.8 10.7 47.1
Lothian 24.2 18.8 19.4 9.1 40.0
Orkney 6.4 15.8 31.3 11.6 65.5
Shetland 11.5 22.6 31.7 14.9 43.6
Tayside 10.8 14.7 19.5 7.9 60.7
Western Isles 6.0 8.7 42.1 4.5 33.3
Scotland (weighted values) 15.1 17.9 23.7 9.4 44.9


Table I3 Percentage of children with an appliance, those with need and no appliance (both subjective and objective), and those with need waiting for an appliance by DEPCAT score.
Health Board % with Appliance % with No Appliance
% Subjective Need % Objective Need % Both % Waiting with Both
1 26.0 10.9 18.4 7.2 68.8
2 19.5 15.3 19.9 7.7 47.8
3 13.8 17.4 24.8 10.0 51.3
4 15.2 18.9 23.6 9.7 39.5
5 14.2 22.8 27.2 12.8 45.9
6 11.3 17.1 25.8 8.9 41.5
7 9.4 18.6 24.9 8.1 32.3

Back to top


Appendix J Codes used for Assessment of Caries and Sealants

Tooth Codes Extracted (caries) 6
Extracted (ortho) 7
Unerupted U U
Missing (trauma) T T


Surface Codes Present and "sound" G G


Arrested dentine caries 1
Decayed (dentine-visual) 2V
Decayed (dentine-cavity) 2C
Unrestorable 3
Filled and decayed 4


Filled, no decay F
Filled, needs replacing R
Sealed surface, type unknown $
Obvious sealant restoration N
Crown/advanced procedure C


Trauma - fracture T
Trauma - treated X
Trauma - discoloured Y


Excluded 9

Back to top


Appendix K Abbreviations used for Health Boards

Health Board Abbreviation
Argyll & Clyde A&A
Ayrshire & Arran A&C
Borders BOR
Dumfries & Galloway D&G
Fife FIFE
Forth Valley FV
Grampian GRA
Greater Glasgow GG
Highland HIG
Lanarkshire LAN
Lothian LOTH
Orkney ORK
Shetland SHET
Tayside TAY
Western Isles WI

Back to top


Appendix L

Figure L1 Map of D3MFT results for 14 year olds in Scotland (by Heath Board) 1994/95

Figure L1

Figure L2 Map of D3MFT results for 14 year olds in Scotland (by Heath Board) 1998/99

Figure L2

Back to top


Appendix M

Figure M1 Map of D3MFT results for 14 year olds in Scotland (by Heath Board) 1994/95

Figure M1

Back to top


Return to Report of the 1998/99 Survey of 14 Year Old Children index.

Contact Us | A to Z Index | Search the University | Site Map
Maintained by: B.C.Bonner at DHS&RU Disclaimer| Privacy | Valid XHTML1.0