Policy document approved by Senate on 13 October 2004
This paper outlines a University policy for personal development plans (PDPs). It describes three key routes for implementing PDPs in a way that is resource-effective, flexible, and appropriate to the mix of vocational and non-vocational subjects taught at Dundee. These are: (i) a Web-based ePDP account to be provided for all undergraduate students, with online guidance; (ii) a tailored personal development programme for vocational/professional disciplines; and (iii) support for career-planning for non-vocational students, including an optional credit-bearing module.
Introduction
The creation of Personal Development Plans (PDPs) is part of the HE Progress File being introduced across all levels of higher education, resulting from the report of The National Committee of Inquiry in Higher Education (Dearing 1997; and, for Scotland, Garrick, 1997).
It is proposed by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA) that all institutions should have a policy for PDPs in place by academic session 2005/06 (QAA, 2004a). Accordingly, the Academic Secretary, Dr Ian Francis, convened a meeting of interested parties on the 26th April 2004 to discuss the development of a University policy on PDPs for students. As a result of the meeting, a Working Party on PDP Policy was established, with the following remit:
'to draft an initial report providing options on a University policy on students' (including research students) use of PDPs and the procedures required to deliver the policy, based on the use of Blackboard's "e-portfolio" system.'
It was identified that a key task towards achieving this goal was to:
'survey [the University's] vocational degree programmes to identify where the provision of PDPs is either mandatory or desirable' .
Definitions and Principles
There are many publications and websites providing definitions and suggestions for implementing PDPs1. The Working Group confined itself in the main to considering documentation produced by national bodies such as the Dearing Committee, the QAA, the Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC) and the Learning and Teaching Support Network (LTSN).
According to Dearing (1997), students' progress files should consist of:
The LTSN (2004) accordingly defines personal development planning as:
'a structured and supported process undertaken by an individual to reflect upon their own learning, performance and / or achievement and to plan for their personal, educational and career development.'
The QAA (2004b) published a set of guidelines for HE progress files, from which the following main principles of operation have been extracted:
Additionally, the Working Party believes that students should gain a tangible end product from personal development planning, specifically a well-developed curriculum vitae, underpinned by an understanding of transferable skills, career planning, employability issues and lifelong learning. In some cases, this can be part of, or supplemented by, an e-portfolio that can be viewed by potential employers. Construction of these components of a PDP should act to focus students' minds on employability issues and the importance of qualifications, personal qualities and work experience in that context.
The QAA is clear that PDPs work best when embedded into the course syllabus and when adopted from the start of a student's programme of study (QAA, 2004b). The literature also suggests that PDPs are most successful when treated as formative rather than summative, thereby raising students' motivation, self-awareness, and understanding of 'employability'2 and career options during and after study.
Factors influencing PDP policy at Dundee
The University offers a wide range of degrees, and many of its vocational qualifications are accredited by professional bodies. Such accredited degrees often include a requirement to carry out PDP-like activities. In certain cases, the structure and process may be defined by an accrediting or validating professional body (see Appendix 2), while in others, the department may use subject benchmarking or another reference point. The accrediting body will normally include audit of the PDP scheme within its degree validation process. Moreover, regarding audit of institutional PDP schemes, the QAA states that it will:
'support the introduction of policy and, when practice is established, be responsible for providing public assurance that institutional policies are being implemented effectively'.
At present it is unclear what form of audit of PDP schemes the QAA will introduce. The Working Party feels the University's PDP policy should include provision for an internal audit of PDP implementation, uptake and effectiveness and thereby ensure it is robust to external scrutiny. The University's PDP scheme may also be reviewed as part of the QAA's employability agenda and as a component of Enhancement Led Institutional Review (ELIR) and internal subject reviews. In addition, for the continuous improvement of learning and teaching, the SHEFC Condition of Grant3 requires the embedding of transferable skills in order to enhance employability. The PDP scheme would enable this process to be much more transparent.
The University's PDP policy must accommodate and support the needs of students studying vocational subjects, whilst simultaneously providing support for the general student body studying non-vocational, non-accredited degrees.
Any PDP scheme runs the risk of being perceived as burdensome bureaucracy if it is not properly embedded within the learning and teaching structure. Ideally, paperwork should be minimized. These factors, combined with the University of Dundee's ethos for devolved management of academic affairs, point towards a flexible scheme that involves a 'light touch' in terms of administration and student and staff input, but which provides options for:
(a) faculties and departments to adopt the highly structured approaches demanded by some professional bodies;
(b) individual students to engage with as they see fit, after appropriate induction; and
(c) departments to embed career planning and PDP activities within degree programmes (e.g. an accredited module) or via workshops, seminars and/or on-line support.
An important factor in developing policy and practice at Dundee is the recent introduction of the Blackboard Content Systemâ„¢, supported centrally by the Learning Enhancement Unit and IT services. This web-based extension to the University's Blackboard virtual learning environment offers an on-line e-portfolio system that is potentially configurable not only to the generic needs of the student community, but also to the needs of those studying for accredited degrees. It can be patched to the Registry's SITS-SMS system to provide automatic data transfer, e.g. to assign each student to the appropriate e-portfolio model and to provide a feed for transcript-related information within each PDP. Furthermore, being web-based, links to appropriate support materials can easily be created. The software complies with relevant accessibility criteria. Some departments may wish to use different products, perhaps because of validation requirements, but under current funding arrangements, this could not be supported centrally.
PDPs represent a potentially valuable tool for the University to improve employability, retention and student attainment. It should be noted that 'employability' is a key theme of the QAA's Enhancement-led Institutional Review (ELIR) programme for 2004-05. Our PDP policy should be career-focussed to enable the University to meet, if not exceed, its quality-assessed objectives in this area. Any PDP scheme should also substantially meet the University's QAA obligations under CEIG (Careers Education Information and Guidance).
The University Careers Service is able to participate in curriculum-based career-planning events, including workshops, seminars and accredited modules. For students in non-vocational areas, the PDP/careers education element is very successfully delivered at some other Universities through a credit-bearing module in Career Planning. For example, a 22 SCOTCAT point Level 2 stand-alone module has successfully been on offer at the University of Stirling since 1997, and students who have completed it were 32% more likely to gain a 'graduate track' job after their degree.
For students studying vocational degrees, the Careers Service is also willing to support students on a 'vertical' basis, i.e. tailored input at every level of study. Such programmes and sessions are already in place in Accountancy, Law, Engineering, Applied Computing, Geography, Town Planning, Social Work and Biochemistry, amongst others. Students within vocational areas are often already engaged in ongoing professional training which often directly replicates the career-planning aspect of PDP. Vocational departments also tend to have a greater ownership of their students from years one or two, therefore facilitating the implementation of a vertical system.
Internships and credit-bearing work placements are also effectively used at other universities as a means of developing student 'employability' through the use of an integral learning log and report. If resourced, this mechanism could be developed at Dundee. Such a scheme would build on a number of joint DUSA/Careers Service placement initiatives using the volunteer centre, teacher experience via the wider access centre and class rep central projects, and a range of placement opportunities negotiated within the local area. This would develop closer links with the community whilst also developing student employability skills.
Proposed University Policy
Taking the above factors into account, the Working Group proposes the following University policy:
The Working Party's recommendations for implementing the PDP policy and achieving these outcomes are detailed in Table 1.
Main outcomes and performance indicators (PIs)
The main outcomes of the PDP policy outlined in Section D will be:
For the next two academic sessions, possible milestones in the process of introducing the PDP schemes might include:
The operation in the first two years of the PDP and associated schemes will be the subject of a joint report presented by the Directors of the Careers Service and LEU to the Learning and Teaching Committee at its final meeting of each academic session. The Academic Standards Committee will similarly report to the Learning and Teaching Committee on faculty schemes they have monitored and evaluated. The PDP policy, its implementation and resourcing will be reviewed in the light of these reports.
In the long-term, the impact on employment and student retention will be monitored by the Careers Service and Centre for Learning and Teaching.
Funding for proposed developments
The generic ePDP scheme and degree-tailored ePDPs will need to be developed by a specialist learning technologist, in consultation with others. A post within the LEU that includes this task in the job description has already been approved by the Principal's Advisory Group. Funding for the Blackboard Learning Content software and appropriate hardware have similarly been approved. Where degree programmes require configuring of the Blackboard e-portfolio system to suit the needs of accreditation, it may be appropriate to include this in the project-based scheme for e-learning development also approved recently. This will allow faculty-based staff to work closely with learning technologists within the LEU to tailor their ePDPs appropriately.
Contributions by the Careers Service to teaching, including the proposed accredited career-planning module, will be treated as falling within the remit and job descriptions of staff within that unit, and further staffing is not envisaged at this stage. For the accredited module, FTE income will be retained in the faculty, with the Careers Service only receiving marginal costs associated with publicity and delivery of the unit. The resourcing for internships will be the subject of a separate paper to be considered as part of the Student Services budget in 2005-06.
For the current financial year (2004-5), the costs associated with meetings and publicity will be absorbed within the existing budgets of the Careers Service and the Centre for Learning and Teaching, but these may need to be included in future budget proposals by these units.
Conclusion
The proposed policy for the implementation of PDPs at the University of Dundee allows the institution to meet QAA and CEIG requirements. The policy has the potential to be part of further developments in connection with employability being a key enhancement theme for 2004-05. It is the Working Party's belief that the resulting University strategy can be delivered in a way that is flexible and resource-effective; is appropriate to the mix of vocational and non-vocational subjects taught at Dundee; and will be of real and lasting benefit to students.
Measures to enhance employability have the potential for improving student retention and attainment, increasing graduate employment levels and enhancing attitudes to lifelong learning. PDPs represent an important means of helping students to reflect on and enhance their employability. This can also benefit departments in student and employer evaluations as part of the Programme Review process.
PDPs are a key theme for the QAA and of degree accreditation by professional bodies, and our policy and its implementation will be audited at various stages in future. To be successful, the policy requires constructive input from many different parties. In particular, the need for involvement by faculties and teaching teams in the PDP scheme should not be underestimated. If PDPs are not embedded within the learning and teaching structure, then they run the risk of being misunderstood or ignored.
References
Dearing, R. (1997). Higher Education in the Learning Society. Report of the National Committee, the National Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education. HMSO Norwich. Also available 25/05/04 http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/ncihe/
Garrick, R (1997). Higher Education in the Learning Society. Report of the Scottish Committee, the National Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education. HMSO Norwich. Also available 25/05/04 http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/ncihe/
Gosling, D. (2003). Introduction. In: Personal Development Planning, SEDA Paper 115, pp. 5-13. Staff and Educational Development Association Ltd, Birmingham.
LTSN (2004). Personal Development Planning. Available 11/05/04. http://www.ltsn.ac.uk/genericcentre/index.asp?id=16906
QAA (2004a) Developing a Progress File for HE: Summary Report of the Consultation Exercise. Recommendations for Policy on PDP. Available 11/04/05. http://www.qaa.ac.uk/crntwork/progfilehe/summary/pdppolicy.htm
QAA (2004b). Guidelines for HE Progress files. Available 11/05/04. http://www.qaa.ac.uk/crntwork/progfileHE/guidelines/progfile2001.pdf
Also relevant, although not cited in this document, is the following:
Juwah, C. S. et al. (2001). Personal Development Planning in Practice: A Series of Case Studies. PDP in HE Scotland Network, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen